Sunday, August 31, 2014

Wait, is that... human bones on Mars? [feedly]



----
Wait, is that... human bones on Mars?
// Gizmodo

Wait, is that... human bones on Mars? Not quite, conspiracy theorists: in fact it's just a rock that happens to look a little bit like a femur thigh bone. It was snapped by the Mars rover Curiosity using its MastCam. [NASA]


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

Lost City of Lagunita Among Two Ancient Mayan City Discoveries [feedly]



----
Lost City of Lagunita Among Two Ancient Mayan City Discoveries
// Mysterious Universe

mayan

Whomever had stood here on November 29th in the year 711 A.D. is long forgotten to the passing centuries. An etching in stone commemorates the visit, which is merely one of many discovered among stones lining an ancient city site on the Yucatan Peninsula that has long been shrouded in mystery; as well as foliage dense enough to help ensure it's location would remain well-hidden.

Indeed, while the identity of this ancient traveler may forever remain a mystery, their indelible mark remains at a spot in the heart of the Mexican jungle that was once long-lost, and then rediscovered; but then curiously, it was lost again.

The Mayan ruins of Lagunita were first uncovered by American archaeologist and epigrapher Eric Von Euw in the 1970s, who was visiting the region of Campeche four decades ago. While there, he uncovered what appeared to be a massive stone facade–a huge doorway distinctive of such Mayan sites–but despite documenting the discovery, and even giving it a name, his description of where the site was discovered was poor enough that future attempts by archaeologists to return to the site had resulted in failure. Lost Lagunita, it seemed, had been lost all over again. 

Fast forward some four decades to the present: only recently, a team of archaeologists led by researcher Ivan Sprajc have announced that the once-found and lost-again city has indeed been rediscovered, with the help of aerial photography of the region that provided helpful clues about Lagunita's possible whereabouts. But in addition to the rediscovery of Von Euw's lost city, remarkably, a second set of ruins was uncovered nearby.

Mayan calendar

Dubbed Tamchen, a name borrowed from Mayan mythology, the second site very nearly mirrors the first location, from it's large chambers and ornate building structures, to a large pyramid that each location features. However, in addition to the aboveground structures, there are reportedly a number of hidden underground chambers at the Tamchen site, which indicate an elaborate system the builders had designed for purpose of collecting rainwater and storing it in cooler below-ground containment areas.

However, it is interesting to note that Mayan mythology entails that caves (which facades such as that found at the newly rediscovered Lagunita site are built to resemble) are entrances to a watery underworld. Caves in Mayan culture were also representative of the mother's womb, and hence, it might also be interpreted that the underground chambers found at Tamchen were somehow representative of fertility, the womb, and the Mayan traditions that associated each with an aqueous world that existed below ground.

While the exact age of these lost Mayan cities remains in question, it is believed that each location may have existed as far back as 300 B.C.; this would have made Lagunita 1000 years old already, at the time its "mystery traveler" would have left the 700-year-old etching discovered there recently.


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

The Walking Dead of China [feedly]



----
The Walking Dead of China
// Mysterious Universe

Delicious and deadly

If you think that the concept of the jerky, slow-moving zombies is a relatively modern one, then it is very much a case of time to think again. Within Chinese culture and folklore, tales of such abominations date back centuries. In China, the zombie is known as the jiang-shi. And it is just about as deadly and terrifying as its Haitian and western counterparts.

Jiang-shi translates into English as "stiff corpse." And there is a very good reason for that: the movements and gait of the Chinese undead are not at all dissimilar to the zombies of George A. Romero's Night of the Living Dead.

In China, the jiang-shi is a creature with a seemingly never-ending case of rigor mortis. Most people are familiar with the concept of this post-death condition: when a person dies, the body significantly stiffens. This is due to a now-permanent lack of oxygen, which prevents the body from producing Adenosine triphosphate, a molecule significantly involved in the regulation of the human metabolism.

As the metabolic system finally comes to an irreversible halt, the process of rigor mortis quickly begins. Many people, however, are unaware that rigor mortis is not a permanent condition. While it typically sets in just a few hours after death, within a day or so, its effects have completely vanished and the body is as supple in death as it was in life. For the jiang-shi, however, rigor mortis never, ever goes away, something which ensures the creature retains a stiff, robotic gait at all times, just like Romero's infamous ghouls.

Notably, the jiang-shi has another zombie parallel: like its cinematic counterpart, the jiang-shi feeds on humans. Whereas the walking and running undead need human flesh to fuel their bodies, the jiang-shi is fuelled by the very essence of what makes us human: the human soul.

Chinese tradition tells of the soul being the container of a powerful energy, one which the average jiang-shi craves, and that is known as Qi. The average zombie may be quite content to eat its prey while they are still alive and fighting for their lives, but the jiang-shi is first required to slaughter its victim before the act of devouring Qi can begin in earnest.

Pale ghost with black eyes

In the same way that there are two kinds of zombie – the Haitian, mind-controlled type and the rabid, infected of the movies – so too there are two groups of jiang-shi. One is a freshly dead person who reanimates extremely quickly, perhaps even within mere minutes of death taking place. The other is an individual who rises from the grave months, or even years, after they have passed away, but who displays no inward or outward evidence of decomposition.

As for how and why a person may become a jiang-shi, the reasons are as many as they are varied: being buried prematurely, dabbling in the black arts, and, rather interestingly, getting hit by lightning can all result in transformation from a regular human to a jiang-shi. On this latter point of lightning, electricity has played a significant role in the resurrection of the dead in the world of fiction, and most noticeably in Mary Shelley's classic novel of 1818, Frankenstein.

There is another way of transforming into a jiang-shi, too, one which zombie aficionados will definitely be able to relate to: when a person is killed and their Qi is taken, the victim also becomes a jiang-shi. What this demonstrates is that the jiang-shi's act of stealing energy is very much the equivalent of the zombie delivering an infectious bite.

And, just like most zombies of movies, novels and television shows, most jiang-shis don't look good in the slightest. Although the jiang-shi typically appears relatively normal when it first reanimates – in the sense that decomposition is not in evidence – things soon change, and not for the better. The walking, jerky corpse of the jiang-shi begins to degrade significantly, the rank odor of the dead becomes all-dominating, and the flesh begins to hang, turning an unhealthy-looking lime color as it does so.

Killing a jiang-shi can be just as difficult as putting down a cinematic zombie. A bullet to the body of a zombie may briefly slow it down. But only a head-shot is going to guarantee the monster stays down permanently. It's very much the same with the jiang-shi: the trick is in knowing what actually works best.

Chinese vinegar

The jiang-shi cannot abide vinegar, which acts as the equivalent of a deadly poison. While actually managing to pour significant amounts of vinegar into the mouth of a ferocious jiang-shi may prove to be far more than tricky, it is said to work at a rapid rate.

Smearing the skin of a jiang-shi with the blood of a recently dead dog will also put a jiang-shi to rest, although exactly why is a very different matter. Mind you, providing it worked, would you even care why? No, you probably would not. You would simply be glad to be alive!


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

Watching a Solar-Powered Marble Machine Will Clear Your Addled Brain [feedly]



----
Watching a Solar-Powered Marble Machine Will Clear Your Addled Brain
// Gizmodo

Watching a Solar-Powered Marble Machine Will Clear Your Addled Brain

For those who ditched their click-and-clacking Newton's Cradle decades ago, this Solar Marble Machine just might be the modern ball-based meditation tool of your DIY dreams. What does it "do"? Not much! But that's precisely the point.

I mean, technically it has a very simple repetitive function: Solarbotics crafted the gear-and-spiral combo to operate in time with a smart circuit that stores energy collected from a mini solar cell. Every few seconds (or minutes, if you're in a windowless cube) the wheel turns a teensy bit, releasing a marble down the twisty slide to the bottom, where it's eventually carried up to the top again. If you're in a really dark spot—like Milton in the basement keeping company with a sad red Swingline—you can make the whole thing make its rounds manually.

The kit comes with all the parts you need—motors, diodes, transistors, and capacitors—but you will have to track down a soldering iron to put them together.

Desktop stress-relievers and mental distractions might seem a little outdated—a goofy toy buy from Spencer's or Brookstone at the mall—and mobile offices make outfitting a physical workspace a bit of a dying breed, but I dig this modified, automated Mouse Trap gadget, and would gladly while away a bitty chunk of time watching these little thangs roll (it's never not mesmerizing). Buy one here for $33. [Maker Shed; Solarbotics]


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

Which is Better: Ebooks or Paper Books? [feedly]



----
Which is Better: Ebooks or Paper Books?
// Gizmodo

Which is Better: Ebooks or Paper Books?

With the advance of phones, tablets, and ereaders, ebooks have become a popular reading standard. Still, there's something about the feel of an old-fashioned paper book. Which do you think is the best?

There are obvious perks for both sides. Books don't run out of batteries or malfunction, but reading devices can store thousands of ebooks in multiple formats. So where do you land? Does the feel and weight of a proper book make the reading experience more enjoyable? Or do you relish in the Bradburian nightmare of all digital reading?

What We're Looking For

Yep, it's another flame war, fellow life hackers. Slip into your fireproof gear, dive into the discussions below, and let us know what you think. Our hope is that when we sift through the ashes, we'll get a reasonable look at both sides of the argument. Just keep in mind that we're using the term "flame war" a little tongue-in-cheek: we'll actually be looking for the polite, well-reasoned, and well-articulated arguments to feature in our follow-up.

Photo by Igor Zh (Shutterstock).


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

Stop Refrigerating Your Butter [feedly]



----
Stop Refrigerating Your Butter
// Gizmodo

Stop Refrigerating Your Butter

Do you keep your butter in the refrigerator? You do? Stop it. Stop it right this second. You're ruining your butter experience and making your toast taste like failure. Let me tell you why.

Butter is a wonderful substance. Made by churning cream until it separates into buttermilk and fat globules, butter is not only delicious but also versatile. Butter will make pretty much any food outside of breakfast cereal taste better. In order to enjoy your butter-on-bread or butter-on-corn, however, you have to be able to spread it. And anyone who's ever pulled a cold stick of butter out of the fridge with the hopes of smearing that yummy stuff on toast knows that cold butter simply does not spread.

Not only does cold butter not spread, it also destroys. Try spearing a cold paddy of butter on a piece of untoasted bread, and you're going to end up with whole grain carnage. The butter grabs onto the surface of the bread and rips it apart, like a tiller tearing up a garden. If you do manage to get the butter somewhat distributed, you probably won't notice the deliciousness, because the cold also mutes the flavors. That's a real bummer, because butter is basically delectable.

It doesn't have to be like this. In fact, most of the world does not suffer from the murderous cold butter problem, because most of the world leaves their butter on the kitchen counter, where it belongs.

Stop Refrigerating Your Butter

If you've ever visited, say, France, you'll notice how wonderfully spreadable room temperature butter is. And it's also more delicious than you've given it credit for. Butter is complex! In its guide to butter standards, the United States Department of Agriculture describes the very best butter as "fine and highly pleasing." The USDA also details 17 different flavor profiles in various types of butter, from "aged" to "malty" to "weed." Have you ever tasted malty butter? Probably not, because you probably keep your butter in the refrigerator.

It's likely that you keep butter in the fridge because you think it's safer that way. After all, butter is made from cream, and if you leave cream out in the open for too long, it can go bad. And if you consume bad cream, you could get sick, if not from the rancid taste then certainly from the foreign bacteria that feasted on the stuff when it was out in the open.

This line of thinking doesn't really apply to butter, though, at least not in that extreme. The cream that's used to make your standard market variety butter is almost always pasteurized, and it takes quite some time for pasteurized dairy products to go bad. Foreign bacteria is still attracted to pasteurized dairy products. Butter can indeed go bad. But as long as you keep it covered, it's very unlikely that anything bad will happen to the butter before you've had a chance to eat it all.

Stop Refrigerating Your Butter

Yes, a stick of butter will lose its shape if it gets too warm. That's a good reason to cool it off. At room temperature, however, the butter will remain cool enough to keep its shape but warm enough to spread smoothly. To keep butter at the ideal temperature, you might consider buying a butter crock or a simple covered butter dish.

If you have any doubts about this room temperature butter argument, let me direct you to the USDA guide "How to Buy Butter." The agency acknowledges that "ready spreadability" requires removing the butter from refrigerator "10 to 15 minutes before use." It does not, however, warn against keeping the butter at room temperature at all times.

Just to be sure about the official American government perspective, I contacted the Food and Drug Administration. While the FDA has plenty of warnings about the perils of raw milk, the agency concedes that keeping butter out in the open is usually fine. An FDA food safety expert wrote in an email, "One can get away with storing butter at ambient temperature for a while since the temperature usually won't be high enough to deform or melt the product and it will not appreciably accelerate the oxidative rancidity process, meaning that the butter will keep just fine for a while."

Now exactly how long "a while" is totally depends. The FDA wasn't able to give us a specific timeframe because factors like how much light the butter is exposed to, whether it's salted or not, and how much bacteria it had in it to begin with will all affect how long it will last. Their expert added say that this strategy works better in cooler climates than in warmer ones. Either way, leaving your butter on the counter in a covered container is perfectly safe, but all things in moderation.

So let's review. Keeping butter in the fridge makes it hard and flavorless. Keeping butter on the counter makes it soft and delicious. As long as it's done right, leaving butter out at room temperature is also just as safe as leaving it in the fridge. Any questions?

Images via Shutterstock / Flickr


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

8 Email Fails That Will Make You Cringe [feedly]



----
8 Email Fails That Will Make You Cringe
// PCMag.com Breaking News

From autofill to accidental reply-alls, one misfired email can wreak a lot of damage. Here are some notable recent #EmailFails that might make you reconsider the good ol' post office.

----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

Friday, August 29, 2014

This Pair of Bionic Pants Is a Chair That You Wear [feedly]



----
This Pair of Bionic Pants Is a Chair That You Wear
// Gizmodo

This Pair of Bionic Pants Is a Chair That You Wear

Sitting won't kill you. It's actually great, and important! And for some people, like assembly line workers, not having a chair to sit in can actually pose a health hazard. That's why Noonee developed the Chairless Chair, a chair you can wear.

Essentially a pair of mechanical pants that can lock in place, the Chairless Chair acts as a brace that any weary worker can wear at all times, and then simply lock into place and lean on when the opportunity presents itself. It's a one-legged milking stool with a touch of Elysium. And because the Chairless Chair doesn't actually touch the ground—it uses its hip harness to simply redirect ass-weight to the heels of the sitter's foot—it's apparently unobtrusive when it's not in chair mode, allowing wearers to walk normally, or even run. That is, if they aren't too busy basking in the glory of being seated.

The idea came from Noonee CEO Keith Gunura during his time working in a UK packing facility at age 17. And like all good ideas, it was born of the eternal desire "to sit anywhere and everywhere," as Gunura so eloquently put it to CNN.

In its current form, the aluminum and carbon fiber Chairless Chair weighs in at just under five pounds, distributed over the whole lower body. That is to say "an absurdly low amount of effort to haul a chair around everywhere you go." And just imagine how fantastic it would be if motorized. For the time being though, it's staying simple, and the plan is to go into trials on factory floors at BMW and Audi this year. Hopefully it'll make its way into the consumer world shortly after. Forget jetpacks; the future is about sitting anywhere. [Noonee via Hacker News]

Image via Noonee


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang [feedly]



----
The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang
// Gizmodo

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

Stephen Chang tells me he loves to think about how the future will weave technology into humans. He has done a lot of cool art so far and I'm sure he'll get far. If he doesn't, that's fine: He got his design for the Rogue Shadow ship—from the game Star Wars: The Force Unleashed—turned into an official Lego set.

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

And that's a pretty amazing career highlight right there.

I think his other designs are cooler, though. Like this near-future plane that I wish were real right now:

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

And this cool private jet:

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

Far future cities and transports:

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

His Star Wars stuff:

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

I like his futuristic sense of fashion too:

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

The futuristic jets, humans, and Star Wars designs of Stephen Chang

Stephen Chang has been a concept designer for the last nine years, starting off at Activision, moved on to Lucasarts and worked at Electronic Arts. He even got his design of the Rogue Shadow ship for The Force Unleashed turned into an official Lego set. His main passion is illustrating how we are all evolving as humans and how technology/nature is weaved into where we are going.

You can follow him in his sites, here and here.


This is part of a series in which we are featuring really cool 2D or 3D illustrations and animations. If you are an illustrator or animator with high quality work, please drop me a line here.


SPLOID is a new blog about awesome stuff. Join us on Facebook


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

The Quantum Effect of Anaesthesia: A New Theory of Consciousness [feedly]



----
The Quantum Effect of Anaesthesia: A New Theory of Consciousness
// Mysterious Universe

QuantConnect

One of the things we take for granted in this age of technology and science, is the medical knowledge that has been hard-won to the toll of billions of deaths over the centuries. The world's respective medical establishments are advancing the front lines of research and patient care (usually), but for the general public there are some basic concepts in the endeavour that, while we know they exist, we don't generally have any idea how they work. Of course, we trust that those who practice medicine do know precisely what they are doing and how their techniques, medications, and surgical procedures work. Sometimes though, that trust is a little misplaced.

I don't mean to overstate the matter. Doctors the world over can be trusted, generally speaking, though there are always going to be individual exceptions. And I don't mean to make you fear for the state of the medical establishment, but there are some things in general medicine that even our best doctors and scientists don't really understand.

In 2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a whopping total of 51.4 million inpatient surgical procedures in the US. Statistics Canada reports 2.9 million inpatient procedures (including births) over 2013.  The vast majority of those millions of medical procedures required the use of some form of anaesthetic, whether general or local. What if I told you that no one really knows how anaesthetics work?

That's kind of a loaded statement, and it requires some explanation.

General-anaesthesia-and-sedation

Anaesthesiology is a highly specialised field, anaesthesiologists are dedicated to only that field. There are three basic kinds of anaesthetics, categorised by the goals doctors want to achieve with their use.

Those goals are:

• Hypnosis – which entails unconsciousness and memory loss (not to be confused with the common use of the term hypnosis)
• Analgesia – which entails a loss or reduction of sensation and autonomic reflex (think Advil)
• Muscle relaxation – often used in therapeutic settings

Each of those categories lists several drugs that are used to bring about the desired effect. Sometimes all of those goals or end-points are needed for a procedure, other times only a single type is needed. It depends on both the nature of the procedure (open cavity surgery, endoscopic surgery, etc.) and on risk factors in the patient – of which there are many. General anaesthetics, most of which achieve both hypnosis and analgesia, are the ones that offer us the biggest mystery.

Surgery in the best of conditions is a risky venture, and while the medical community has a solid understanding of how to apply anaesthetics to achieve those goals safely, that understanding has been gained, more or less, through a process of trial and error, rather than an understanding the chemical mechanics of the drugs.

narkomatplus

Traditionally it's been thought that the drugs have what's called a pharmacological effect on neural receptors and/or ion channels in the brain. That means, effectively, that it was thought that chemical reactions in the brain were the active mechanism, though it's never been adequately described through observation, for obvious reasons. Recent research, however, has shown that this may not be the case.

Dr. Luca Turin, and a team from the Alexander Flemming Research Center in Athens, Greece, has completed a study of the effect common general anaesthetics have on drosophila, also known as fruit flies. Turin and his team conducted a complicated experiment using two groups of flies, in which they essentially froze the flies (to immobilise them) and then exposed them to anaesthetics.  They then measured electron spin resonance (ESR) in their brains. One group showed a pronounced increase in ESR, while the other group – which were a mutated species bred to be immune or highly resistant to anaesthetic effects – showed no increase at all.[1]

That may not mean much to you at all, and certainly it is a difficult thing to understand, but in simple terms, this means that the many various drugs that cause anaesthetic unconsciousness are actually employing a quantum effect on our brains. And that's fairly big news.

mz5104c16a

You may recall, a few years ago, Anaesthesiologist Dr. Stuart Hameroff and Theoretical Physicist Dr. Roger Penrose presented a theory of quantum consciousness, called Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR). Their theory has met with a good deal of criticism and skepticism, though it certainly hasn't been defeated. Orch-OR says, in the most basic terms, that consciousness is the result of the state of sub-atomic particles in the brain.

It is a very complex idea, but at first glance it seems to be supported by Turin's research and conclusions. To be clear, as pointed out by Dr. Turin (below), the two theories are quite different, however; if chemicals can have an electronic effect on our brains, the result of which is unconsciousness, as Turin claims they do, then it follows that consciousness is fundamentally electronic in nature (in this context, electronic refers electron spin resonance, or the quantum state of electrons).  At it's very core, the Orch-OR theory makes the same claim, but in a different way.

Hameroff has weighed in on Turin's experiment, and rightfully questions the methodology used. Since the flies had to be cooled to just above freezing to keep them immobilised (which was necessary for measuring ESR), the lowered temperature and the altered physiology of the flies could have had an unknown effect on their response to the anaesthetic. Turin admits that there are flaws in this experiment and is continuing with his research, but the simple fact that the two groups of flies had different ESR rates under the same conditions suggests quite strongly that he's on the right track.

The broader meaning of these conclusions, whether flawed or not, is uncertain. If either Turin, or Hameroff and Penrose (or both) turn out to be correct, it could revolutionise neuroscience, and it could both provide a lot of answers for some of the world's biggest and longest pondered questions, and it could present a lot more questions.

 

1. Luca Turin, et al. Electron spin changes during general anesthesia in Drosophila. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404387111


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

The Mysterious River Sharks of the World [feedly]



----
The Mysterious River Sharks of the World
// Mysterious Universe

Shark 2

With their gaping maws full of jagged, sharp teeth, sharks are some of the most feared creatures of the water.  However, most people see these frightening creatures as being strictly confined to the oceans. Don't go to the beach and no sharks, right? However, despite all that you may think you know about sharks, it may surprise you that there are several species that can be found in fresh water. Many people may already be aware of the disturbing tendency for bull sharks to tolerate and even thrive in freshwater environments, but fewer people know that there are actually whole species of sharks that have evolved to live exclusively in freshwater rivers. These are the enigmatic, very little understood, exceedingly rare river sharks.

Most of the river shark species found so far are known only from freshwater specimens and it is thought that they are either fully freshwater creatures or possibly euryhaline, meaning they are able to tolerate a broad range of salinity levels. Most of the known species of river shark are of the family Carcharhinidae, and all but one comprise their own genus, Glyphis. They are most closely related to whaler sharks of the genus Carcharhinus, with which they share the same overall morphology, including a short, broad snout, that is shorter than the mouth is wide, widely spaced nostrils, small, dark eyes, and broad serrated upper teeth. They are robustly built, with a high back that swoops down to the broad, rounded snout.

Whaler shark, a close relative of the river sharks

Whaler shark, a close relative of the river sharks

Although there are of course physical differences between them, one trait that all river sharks share is their extreme rarity. These are among the rarest of sharks, indeed among the rarest of animals, period. Many species of river shark are known only from a few specimens and one is known only from a single holotype. They are so rare that virtually nothing is known of their behavior and ecology other than that they inhabit fresh water.

Here we will look at what little we know about each of the known species of fresh water river sharks and learn about these rare, miraculous creatures.

The Ganges River shark

Perhaps the one river shark that some might be familiar with is the Ganges River shark (Glyphis gangeticus), which inhabits the Hooghley and Ganges river systems of India. The species is known exclusively from specimens captured in fresh water and there have been none found in marine or brackish environments.

The Ganges River Shark shares its habitat with bull sharks, which are known to frequent the same river systems. Indeed Ganges River sharks were once thought to be merely bull sharks, but there are some key morphological differences that differentiate the two into separate species. Whereas the upper teeth of the Ganges River shark are broad, triangular, and serrated just as with those of Bull sharks, the lower teeth are narrower and longer, with spear-like tips. This suggests that the Ganges River shark is more totally devoted to a diet of fish, rather than the more varied diet of Bull sharks. In addition, the Ganges River shark has the unusual feature of eyes that tilt upward in their socket at an angle, which means they probably locate prey by staying near the bottom and spotting the silhouette of their quarry above whereas bull sharks have eyes that are angled laterally or downward and likely catch most of their prey on the bottom. These differences could mean that since the two species eat different food and catch prey at different levels of the water column, Ganges River sharks and bull sharks likely don't compete too much for food in habitats where they occur together.

The Ganges River shark

The Ganges River shark

Unlike other species of river shark, the Ganges River shark has the distinction of having gathered somewhat of a reputation for being a man-eater as there have been reports of Indians bathing in the Ganges River being attacked or killed by sharks. Although it is certainly feasible that a Ganges River shark might mistake the shape of a human for other prey and bite, it is unlikely that most attacks are the result of this species and it is probable that the culprits in these cases are bull sharks rather than Ganges River sharks. Bull sharks are known to be very aggressive man-eaters, and have a more adventurous appetite than the Ganges River shark with its smaller, less formidable teeth and piscivorous lifestyle. It is thought by biologists that most, if not all such attacks on humans reported along the Ganges River are probably carried out by bull sharks.

Until the 1990s, the Ganges River shark was known only from three museum specimens collected in the 19th century. In 1996, after nearly a decade of actively searching for living specimens, a few more Ganges River sharks were captured and studied. These few specimens are all we have to go on and thus the Ganges River shark remains mostly an enigma. The species is considered to be extremely rare, and is listed as critically endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). It is unfortunate that the rare Ganges River shark has such a menacing reputation among locals, since even the death of a single specimen at the hands of vindictive fishermen is a great loss of potential data on this largely mysterious species.

The Northern River Shark

The Northern River shark (Glyphis garricki), is a large species of river shark that may reach up to 2.5 meters (8.2 feet) and possibly up to 3m (10 feet) in length that inhabits remote tidal rivers of Australia's Northern territory, northern Queensland, and Papua New Guinea, where the very first specimens were originally found.

The Northern River shark is thought to mostly frequent brackish, low salinity waterways and make regular ventures into fresh water. The shark's favored habitat is known for its turbid, murky water and low visibility, and thus it possesses unusually small eyes. To make up for its poor vision, the Northern river shark has a higher than normal concentration of ampullae of Lorenzini, which are special receptor organs that can detect the electrical fields of living creatures and help the shark locate prey in poor to zero visibility conditions. Northern river sharks are thought to be piscivorous, as their teeth are rather narrow for their overall size and geared towards smaller prey such as small, bony fish.

Northern river shark

Northern river shark

The Northern river shark was first discovered in 1986 and, like other river sharks, is very rare. It is only known from around 30 specimens collected over the years from a mere handful of scattered river systems, and estimates have suggested that possibly only around 250 mature individuals exist in the wild. Due to its rarity, the Northern river shark has been listed as a critically endangered species by the IUCN Red List. It is thought to be particularly vulnerable to damming and other water programs, which have become more common in the shark's known habitats. In addition, the sharks are vulnerable to haphazard and illegal net fishing for other species in the areas they are known to inhabit. Typically fishermen will catch the sharks by accident, kill them, and toss them overboard. Although recovery projects have been proposed and implemented, the threat of habitat degradation and illegal fishing to the Northern river shark is considered to be so grave that the species may become extinct before we ever learn much more about it.

The Borneo River Shark

The Borneo river shark (Glyphis fowlerae) is a small species that is thought to reach lengths of about 78 cm (31 inches). As the name suggests, they are found in Borneo, specifically in the Kinabatangan River.

The Borneo river shark is one of the rarest of the river shark species, and indeed possibly the rarest of any kind of shark. The species was long known from only a single specimen. In total, only 13 specimens of this species have ever been caught, all from fresh water, and the species was only finally described by science in 2010. The habitat of the Borneo river shark is believed to be extremely small, and thought to comprise just one stretch of the river near a small village.

The Borneo river shark

The Borneo river shark

In 2010 and 2011, soon after the species was formally described, an expedition was sent to try and find more of these elusive sharks, yet the results were not promising. Not only did the expedition fail to find a single specimen of the shark after an exhaustive search, but local fishermen claimed that the sharks hadn't been seen or caught in the river in years. As such, there is the very real possibility that the Borneo river shark is already extinct. Although there have been efforts to preserve the species undertaken by conservation groups such as the Tropical Research and Conservation Centre, sadly it may very well be too little too late.

The Speartooth Shark

The speartooth shark (Glyphis glyphis), also known as the Bizant river shark or Queensland river shark, is native to river systems of northern Australia and New Guinea. It is so named for its unique teeth, which are only serrated near the tips in the lower jaw and are shaped like little spear tips, most likely for impaling and holding onto small, bony fish or other prey. It is a fairly large shark thought to reach lengths of around 2.5–3 m (8.2–10 ft). The shark is thought to mostly inhabit fresh water or brackish tropical rivers with fast currents and muddy bottoms. Visibility in this environment is extremely poor and it is thought that the speartooth shark's eyesight is poor.

Speartooth shark

Speartooth shark

The shark was first discovered as a museum specimen of a juvenile female and described in the early 19th century. This remained the only specimen for the species until 1982, when similar sharks were captured in the Bizant River of Australia. These Bizant river sharks were not considered to be the same species as speartooth sharks at first, and were classified as a different species known simply as Glyphis species A. It was only recently confirmed that the Bizant River sharks are synonymous with speartooth sharks by researchers Leonard Compagno, William White, and Peter Last.

This species is only known from a few juvenile specimens and no adults have been caught, which makes it difficult to accurately discern the speartooth shark's true size, behavior, or even its preferred habitat when fully grown. It is thought to be very rare and critically endangered.

The Irrawaddy River Shark

Certainly the rarest and most mysterious of the river sharks is the Irrawaddy river shark (Glyphis siamensis) of the Irrawaddy River in Myanmar. The species is known from only a single specimen caught in the 19th century near the mangrove covered mouth of the Irrawaddy River near Rangoon. The specimen was a juvenile that measured 60cm (24 inches) long. Using the growth rate of similar sharks as a basis, it is estimated that the shark would have an adult length of around 1–3 m (3–10 ft).

The Irrawaddy River at sunset.

The Irrawaddy River at sunset.

The existence of only a single holotype specimen has created much controversy over the years as to the shark's true classification.  It was originally described as Carcharias siamensis by the Austrian ichthyologist Franz Steindachner, but this was challenged in later years. Many ichthyologists argued that the original specimen was merely an abnormal or deformed bull shark rather than a separate species, but shark systematist Leonard J.V. Compagno classified it as its own species within Glyphis in 2005. The shark has thus come to be known as Glyphis siamensis, but there is still some uncertainty and debate as to how it should be classified.

Heavy fishing and habitat degradation have occurred in the area where the lone specimen was caught, and not a single additional specimen has been found in nearly a hundred years, despite several concerted attempts to locate it. It seems that, as with the Borneo river shark, there is a high likelihood that the Irrawaddy river shark is extinct.

shark_in_river_at_corcovado

The river sharks represent a fascinating group of animals that we know next to nothing about. All of the species here are known from only a handful of specimens and are only very rarely caught or observed in the wild, making it exceedingly difficult to study them or gain any insight into their feeding habits, reproductive characteristics, lifestyles, or even how many of them there truly are.

One thing that is known is that there are not many of these mysterious fresh water sharks left, and their habitats are being degraded at an astonishing rate. Sharks in particular are sensitive to such pressures, as they are known for their small litter sizes, long gestation, and slow growth and rate of maturity, which all means that even small amounts of overfishing, pollution, or other habitat degradation can have devastating effects on their populations. The river sharks are likely no different, with the added complication that they are so confined to limited, smaller, more specialized habitats. Many of the tropical rivers or estuaries in which these river sharks are found are prone to pollution, rampant overfishing, and other human interference such as the building of dams, the clearing of mangroves, or the redirection of water flow.

The river sharks are in trouble, with some of these species likely already extinct. It is somewhat sad to think that these majestic creatures which prowl the freshwater rivers of the world without anyone even knowing they are there may disappear forever before anyone ever finds out. Without serious conservation efforts, the river sharks will die out and their mysteries will die with them.


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone

This is What Curiosity Looks Like After Two Years On Mars [feedly]



----
This is What Curiosity Looks Like After Two Years On Mars
// Popular Science - New Technology, Science News, The Future Now

Curiosity Rover, Then And Now.
Who turned the sepia filter on?

While the Mars rovers' drivers sit in relative comfort here on Earth, the rovers themselves do get beat up a bit. In honor of Curiosity's second anniversary on Mars, The Verge put together a cool story showing the before and after pics of the toll the harsh environment has exacted on the rover. Scroll through for yourself to see some of the dents, scratches and holes that Curiosity has accumulated over the years. Oh, and all the dust it picked up. There's a lot of dust. 

Luckily, Curiosity isn't doomed to live in this condition forever. While the holes and scratches are pretty much a foregone conclusion, there's a chance that the dust will get blown off by the winds on Mars. That's exactly what happened to the Opportunity rover earlier this year. In March, NASA had the 10-year-old rover take a picture of its remarkably clean solar panels earlier this year. According to NASA, they're cleaner than they've been since the rover spent its first winter on Mars in 2005.  

Opportunity Rover, 2010.
Nice and clean

But NASA isn't just relying on the wind to deal with its dust problem. It's also started work on dust shielding technology that it plans to test in space in 2016.  









----

Shared via my feedly reader


Dwight A. Hunt, Sr. A+, MCP 
Facebook and Twitter: dahuntsr

Blogs: 
Books, Podcasts, Old Time Radio & Movie instant stream reviews: http://audio-book-addict.blogspot.com

Tech articles, firearms & all other posts: http://dahuntsr.blogspot.com/

Sent from my iPhone