DLL Incorporation provides Facebook Voucher of 50$ and 100$ Facebook Voucher on very affordable price.
For price inquiry call +91-9136075049 / 8586875020 Skype – speakmeme
email bestboydelhi@gmail.com
We accept Bank Deposit , Net banking , Perfectmoney and Paypal Payments.
More details visit http://speakmeme.com/services/facebook-vouchers/ 
Underground vacuum tube transport networks and classified tunnelling machines get us warmed up before we explore Mike Clelland's new essay on the synchronicities of the UFO Phenomenon and encounters with Owls. WWII Psychics then somehow lead us onto Crop Circles and the untold sightings of huge glass like structures preceding their creation.
Want to access this show? Sign up for Plus+ or try our free podcast today!
     |
DLL Incorporation is offering 10000 Likes on your facebook page only in 25oo INR. For more details call +91-9136075049.
Human beings have always seen unidentified objects in the sky. From the prophet Ezekiel's sighting of a flying wheel in 593 B.C., to the 1561 A.D. Battle over Nuremberg, Germany, to Kenneth Arnold's "pie plate" UFOs spotted near Mt. Rainer, Washington, in June 1947, there are things above our heads that baffle us.
Many of these unidentified flying objects appear to be intelligently controlled aircraft. Others, like the following sightings in California and Illinois, defy explanation.
Wade stopped at the beach in Del Mar, California, on his way home from San Diego to San Marcos, on a lazy summer afternoon. He spent the rest of that June day surf fishing and arrived home after dark, around 9 p.m. "I relaxed, had a beer or two and went to my covered drive to clean my catch," Wade said. "I completed that task and looked to the north at the rocky mountainside in the near distance."
He didn't expect to see what was there. "Above my neighbor's homes across the street something was shimmering and moving rapidly side to side in a space of maybe 60 feet at 20 feet altitude," Wade said. "I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me from the time earlier in the day when I spent time on the beach in the bright afternoon sun. I was wrong."
Two shimmering, nearly transparent parallel lines about three-feet wide in the air moved silently and quickly side to side in the faint glow of a streetlight. "It was just wings and eyes," he said. "The wings didn't flap like a birds, it was more like a dragonfly, but dragonflies don't grow three-foot wingspans, fly at night, or display what seemed to be some kind of intelligence like this thing did."
The entity's side-to-side movements encompassed about 60 feet in what Wade estimated was only a few seconds. Wade said the entity seemed to know he had seen it and it stopped in the air. "Whatever it was, it halted its side-to-side movement and seemed to focus on me," he said.
Fear gripped Wade and he felt his hair rise from his scalp to his ankles. "I was sure it was a real thing, then I noticed the thing had big black eyes," he said. "They weren't friendly eyes at all."
The entity quickly shot across the street toward Wade. He dropped to the pavement and it swooped over his head. "The thing was interested in me," Wade said. "It was staring me down when it was across the street and either attacked or was trying to intimidate me, or who knows what, when it came at me."
Robotic Dragonfly – Original artwork by Skeletox
Wade moved from under the covered part of his drive to get a better look at the swooping thing. It was directly above his head. "I felt great fear," Wade said. "I said to the thing out loud,' I see you.'"
It moved again.
"It zipped back into view from the direction it had gone, and was looking directly down at me with the weird unblinking eyes," he said. "It realized I was looking right at it, and it took off in a flash. It's gone. For good, I hope."
Cool air poured through the open windows of the car as Lisa Becker and her husband pulled through their suburban Chicago neighborhood of Oak Brook one night in 1996. Nature painted the dusk pink, orange and red, but something dark suddenly smeared the canvas. "As we approached our subdivision, we saw a large blackness in the air," Becker said. "It was about eight feet in diameter, about 100 feet away from us, and about 30 feet in the air. It was moving in a straight line."
Her husband also saw this black shadow. "It had no specific shape and its edges undulated," she said. "As it flew closer we pulled over to watch it. It was so low that you could have hit it with a rock."
When they noticed the object, the Beckers later named the "pterodactyl," it slowly and noiselessly crept through the sky from east to west about 50 yards from the back of their house. "It moved in a perfectly straight line as if it were on a tightrope," she said.
The couple watched the object as it sailed about 10 feet past them, 30 feet in the air, and folded in upon itself, and disappeared. "It was not a vehicle," Becker said. "The best way to describe it would be to say it looked like a very large flat stingray (with) no tail. It moved in a perfectly straight line, and never varied from its path."
This left the college-educated Beckers wondering what they saw. "My husband thought it was strange, but didn't have any particular emotional response to the thing," Becker said. "It didn't seem to have any sort of depth to it. It was like looking into a very dark spot that could have blotted out anything behind it. It didn't have any wind or exhaust in its trail. Our best thought, though entirely illogical, was that it was a rip in the space-time continuum."
Whatever the black, undulating "pterodactyl" was flying over their house, the memory has stayed with the Beckers for years. "I asked myself at the time, 'how did the object make me feel?'" she said. "It wasn't pleasant, maybe even slightly menacing. Not that it was menacing me. It creeped me out a little that it clearly came from the direction of my back yard. So it easily could have crossed over my house."
The couple hasn't seen anything like the object since. "My husband and I were amazed. We're just regular people who saw something strange one day and still can't reconcile that thing with our logical minds," Becker said. "This stuff is sort of like UFOs in that there is no one you can talk to or no one to report it to. At least with UFOs there is MUFON. Ever since then I've been wondering if anyone else has ever seen something like it."
Most people know that the Great Pyramid has four sides. Many assume that they are flat. What is not well known is that the pyramid's sides are not perfectly flat. And they never have been. At the time they were completed, the sides were covered with casing-stones made of white Tura limestone, which gave the finished Pyramid a smooth surface. Most of the original casing stones have been removed. The process of removing them started about 700 years ago. Originally, they were removed so that they could be used in the construction of other buildings in the Cairo vicinity. The remaining core masonry blocks are set in a stair-step fashion.
 |
| William Matthew Flinders Petrie, source: Wikipedia |
The fact that the sides of the Great Pyramid are not perfectly flat and straight was discovered 130 years ago by Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie. Flinders Petrie is known as the father of Egyptology. Petrie, a skillful surveyor, decided to do a precise survey of the Great Pyramid's base and structure and also make thorough measurements of the pyramid's interior chambers, passageways, and features. While doing his survey, Petrie noticed that the middle of each base-side of the pyramid's core masonry was "distinctly hollowed in" (some 30 inches) instead of straight from corner to corner, and that "each side has a sort of groove" that ran from the top down the middle of the sides.
From the outer edges, the surface slants slightly inward toward the center, making a vertical center-line from the apex down the middle of each triangular side. Near the bottom, the center-line branches off left and right to form a triangle inset at the bottom center of each base-side.
Each side of the Great Pyramid was built with these angles in it, and some photographs of the pyramid show them. They are most visible when the sun makes shadows on the angles of the sides.
Why did the ancients build the pyramid's sides angled in towards the center-line instead of making the sides perfectly flat? I believe there was a logical reason, which I will explain.
When Petrie began to do his survey of the Great Pyramid, he cleared away the sand and rubble where the four cornerstones had once sat. He found the rectangular flat depressions or sockets that were carved in the bedrock at the four corners; the casing-cornerstones sat in these corner-sockets until they were removed hundreds of years ago with most of the other casing-stones. Petrie measured the distance from the end of one corner-socket to the end of the next corner-socket at the other end of the pyramid's base-side. He measured all four sides in this manner.
The four corner-sockets defined the pyramid's perimeter around the base. When Petrie's lengths of the four sides (defined by the sockets) are added together it equals 36,521 inches. That is significant because 36,525 is the number of days in the year x 100 (there are 365.25 days in the year). The ancient builders made the pyramid's base perimeter around the four corner-sockets to equal the number of days in the year (x 100).
The distance of 36,525 inches around the base perimeter is also significant because a half-minute of longitude at the earth's equator is equal to 36,525 inches. The earth is divided with longitude and latitude lines. The modern calculation of one-half minute longitude at the equator is 36,523 inches. It is a reasonable deduction, as I see it, that the builders deliberately made the base perimeter equal to one-half minute longitude.
Petrie assumed that the original casing base-line was straight from one pyramid corner to the next corner. But with his survey, he discovered that the core-masonry blocks in the middle of the base-sides were set back some 30 inches more than the corners of the Pyramid's core-masonry; which made the middle of the base-sides' core-masonry slightly "hollowed in." As for the casing-stones that covered the core blocks, Petrie assumed that the casing-stones in the middle of the base-sides had been thicker than the casing-stones near the corners (those near the Pyramid's corners were no longer there), thereby making the casing base-line straight from corner to corner.
He was wrong. Petrie (along with everyone else) did not realize that the original casing base-sides were not perfectly straight to the corners. Actually, the casing-stones followed the angles of the core-masonry. Near the corners of the Great Pyramid the original casing began to slightly turn outward to the outside corners of the corner-sockets where the casing-cornerstones sat.
Petrie's measurement of the four projected sides added together equals 36,275 inches around the base perimeter. Petrie's base-perimeter distance is the same as the distance of one-half minute of latitude at the equator. The modern calculation of one-half minute of latitude at the equator is 36,278 inches.
The Great Pyramid's constructors built in the smaller projected square base to show one-half minute of equatorial latitude. So the builders showed in the pyramid's casing-base perimeter both one-half minute longitude and latitude at the equator. In effect the pyramid was a smaller square base inside the larger perimeter—a smaller pyramid inside a larger pyramid.
Article text and drawings Copyright ©2012 Timothy Milby
Timothy Milby is a long-time A.R.E. member and author of the book The Great Pyramid's Secret Code and The Road to Atlantis: The Pyramid's Amazing Mathematic Code Revealed. Milby has studied the Great Pyramid extensively—the design of its chambers and passageways and its many features and details. His website can be found at AtlantisAndTheGreatPyramid.com. You can reach him by email at tim56765@gmail.com.
Situated on the southern tip of the vast and mountainous Cascade Range – which encompasses parts of British Columbia, California, Washington State, and Oregon – Mount Shasta is a huge, all-dominating peak that, at nearly fifteen thousand feet, is the fifth tallest mountain in the Golden State, and one that has been home to human civilization, in varying degrees, since around 5,000 B.C. It's also a mountain steeped in matters mysterious, unearthly, and deeply ancient.
Indeed, the interior of Mount Shasta is said to house the last vestiges of a mighty, renowned race of legendary people that dominated the planet in the fog-shrouded past. They were known as the Lemurians and were said to have inhabited a now sunken land, possibly situated somewhere in either the Pacific or Indian Ocean.
Although the people of Lemuria reportedly attained their peak millennia upon millennia ago, it was not until the late 19th Century, and through the middle years of the 20th Century, that they caught the public's attention on a large scale – and particularly so in relation to a certain connection with Mount Shasta. Truly, the story is a swirling cauldron of deep strangeness and controversy.
Back in the 1800s, Helena Blavatsky, the co-founder with William Quan Judge and Colonel Henry S. Olcott of the Theosophical Society – the original mandate of which was the study of occultism – claimed to have been exposed to an ancient text of mysterious proportions that was said to have pre-dated the times and people of Atlantis. Its title was the Book of Dzyan and was guarded with near paranoid zeal by a brotherhood of powerful and ancient proportions.
As a result of her alleged exposure to the old and mighty tome, and while in Tibet studying esoteric lore, Blavatsky developed a remarkable framework concerning, and a belief in, the Lemurians that ultimately led to the very heart of Mount Shasta itself.
![blavatsky[1]](http://mysteriousuniverse.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/blavatsky1.jpg)
As Blavatsky described it, the Lemurians were the Third Root Race of a total of seven who were ultimately destroyed by appalled and angered gods after they, the people of Lemuria, turned to bestiality, and in doing so sealed their doom, around 12,500 B.C. But, the gods were not done with life on Earth: they soon embarked on the creation of a Fourth Root Race, the equally legendary Atlanteans.
Little did the gods realize it when they set about the creation of a new race, some of the Lemurians escaped the destruction and made their secret way to – as you may by now have guessed – a certain mountain in the Cascades.
The revelations of Helena Blavatsky were elaborated on to a considerable degree by a British theosophist named William Scott-Elliot. He, in turn, had acquired his data from yet another theosophist, Charles Webster Leadbeater, who claimed clairvoyant communication with spiritually advanced, supernatural masters that imparted a wealth of data on both Lemuria and Atlantis.
Also hot on the heels of Blavatsky, and only six years before the dawning of the 20th Century, a teenager named Frederick Spencer Oliver completed the writing of his book A Dweller on Two Planets. Published in 1905, six years after Oliver's untimely and very early death, the book caused a firestorm of controversy with its claims that the Lemurians shared a lineage with the Atlanteans, and that those Lemurians that escaped the pummeling wrath of the gods made their secret and collective way to Mount Shasta; just as Blavatsky had asserted.
And they weren't just living on the mountain, but deep within it, too, in certain, secret, cavernous depths that Oliver asserted could be accessed if one only knew the specific and secret entrance points of old. If one should ever encounter a tall, white-robed figure on Mount Shasta, said Oliver, it was all but certain to be a Lemurian.
How, exactly, did Oliver know all this? Well, he claimed to have been in contact with a being that called itself Phylos the Tibetan. Phylos, whose controversial data was imparted to Oliver by a mind to mind process known as channeling, was said to have lived a number of lives or incarnations; one as a Lemurian and another as an Atlantean.
So, you may by now be wondering, why am I mentioning all this? Well, Timothy Green Beckley's Global Communications company has just published a brand new edition of Frederick Spencer Oliver's book, under the new title of The Secrets of Mount Shasta and A Dweller on Two Planets.
Running at almost 500 pages, and containing intriguing new material, it's absolutely vital reading for anyone with an interest in the controversies surrounding channeling, the legends of Atlantis and Lemuria, tales of underground civilizations, and much more of an entertainingly weird nature. If lost people, ancient lands, and secrets of the past are your thing, this is a book for you!
Dr. Eben Alexander's "Proof of Heaven" is questioned once again with malpractice questions being raised along with discrepancies in his story. Has the NDE been debunked or are we seeing a desperate character assassination attempt?
Also featured are alien implants in a Sydney man and intelligent light ball phenomenon encounters.
This episode is brought to you by Audible:
Plus+ Extension
The extension of the show is exclusive to Plus+ Members. To learn how to join, click HERE.
Smartphones are supposed to connect us to the world, to keep us plugged-in to the internet no matter where we find ourselves. By and large, they do a great job at that, but every once in a while we hit a hiccup. Despite the lack of any legitimate technical reason why not, some of those 1s and 0s bombing around the internet backbone just refuse to make the trip to mobile devices. I'm talking about placing content restrictions specifically on smartphones and tablets. It's unnatural, anti-internet, anti-user, and I think it's all one big load of crap. But It Was Just There ...
The post Mobile content restrictions are a load of crap appeared first on Pocketnow.
When Google released a new version of Google Maps for Android yesterday, it was quickly discovered that offline mapping support had been removed. You could kind of turn it back on by typing "OK Maps" into the app's search field, but the lack of a dedicated button had users up in arms. Today, Google is announcing that it's adding a "Make this map area available offline" button and that it's rolling out globally later today. There's also a new clickable item in the sidebar called "Where's Latitude?" that'll remind you the service is shutting down on August 9th. Despite these changes, we still can't help but compare the app to Nokia's Here Maps for Windows Phone, which puts particular focus on offline navigation.
Source: Google Maps (Google Plus)
Okay, I might be just a little bit premature in announcing this, but what the heck. A few months isn't that long to wait, at all. Plus, by revealing the data now, and splashing the story on Mysterious Universe, I figured it might possibly generate new leads – and perhaps even prompt old eyewitnesses to come forward. You may very well ask: eyewitnesses to what? Nothing less than the 50th anniversary of a Mothman-style encounter that occurred in Kent, England.
But here's the very interesting thing: the encounter occurred several years before the eerie, shining-eyed beast of Point Pleasant, West Virginia was on anyone's radar. More intriguing is the fact that the description of the beast was eerily Mothman-like. The very same winged beast, but in a completely different part of the planet? Who knows? What I do know, however, is that in November of this year, the case in question will be celebrating its half a century. And, as far I'm concerned, it should not pass without comment or celebration!
For those reasons, I wanted to bring it to your attention right now, in the specific event that doing so may very possibly open new doors, and even re-open older ones, to what really went down on the night that a bunch of friends encountered something terrifying and monstrous. Neil Arnold, a well-known Kent-based cryptozoologist, researcher and author of many acclaimed books on mystery animals, has dug into the now-renowned event, which took place at Sandling Park, Hythe, Kent on November 16, 1963.
Neil's book, The Mystery Animals of the British Isles: Kent, includes the story of the Hythe Mothman, and it's an excellent book that I most definitely recommend to anyone and everyone with an interest in not just cryptozoology in general, but unknown winged things in particular. But what about the night in question? What was the story? Let's take a look at what we know.
The area, known as Sandling Park, was certainly shrouded in overwhelming darkness at the time of the beastly event. But it was hardly the sort of place where one would expect to encounter nothing less than a fully fledged monster. Amazingly, however, that's what apparently happened.
John Flaxton, aged 17 on the night that all hell broke loose, was accompanied by three friends, including 18-year old Mervyn Hutchinson. As they walked along a lane running by the park – after returning from a local Friday night dance – the group of friends became aware of a bright object moving overhead, which they at first took to be nothing stranger than a star. How wrong they were.
The teenagers were amazed, and more than a bit scared, by the object's presence, as they watched it hover and then drop out of sight behind a group of trees. The boys decided to leave the area with haste, but the light soon loomed into view again. It hovered around ten feet from the ground, and at an approximate distance of two hundred feet, then once again went out of sight.
"It was a bright and gold oval", one of the boys reported. "And when we moved, it moved. When we stopped, it stopped." That was not necessarily a good sign!
Suddenly, the boys heard the snapping of twigs from a nearby thicket, and out from the wooded area shuffled a creature of horrendous appearance. "It was the size of a human," reported Mervyn Hutchinson. "But it didn't seem to have any head. There were wings on its back, like bat wings." The group fled, perhaps understandably not wanting to hang around and see what developed next.
Matters didn't end there, however. Five night later, one Keith Croucher saw an unusual object float across a nearby football field. Forty-eight-hours after that, a John McGoldrick, accompanied by a friend, checked out the location and stumbled upon unusual impressions in the ground, which gave every indication that something solid and significant had landed there.
Click for Original artwork by Haitisworst
Neil Arnold has this to say about the matter: "Local UFO experts believed that the case was nothing more than a misinterpretation of natural phenomena, but Flaxton recalled: 'I felt cold all over.'"
Sounds familiar? Mothman fans may very well be nodding their heads in agreement by now!
And, as Neil Arnold also notes: "Three giant footprints were also found in the vicinity which were said to have measured two-feet long and nine inches across. On 11 December, various newspaper reporters accompanied McGoldrick to the area and found that the woods were illuminated by an eerie, glowing light. No-one investigated any further and the case faded as mysteriously as it had emerged."
To this date, the saga of the Mothman of Hythe, Kent remains precisely that: a mystery. Unless, that is, you're one of the original witnesses, reading these words, and still recalling those events of 50 years ago. If you are, then get in touch! Some of us would very much like to know what happened in Sandling Park, Hythe, Kent on the night of November 16, 1963. If any further details are available, and additional light can be shed on the matter, the build up to the 50th anniversary would be an ideal time for the truth to finally come tumbling out.
Feature Artwork by CageyShick05
| |
